What Are the Different Types of Sewage Treatment Systems in France?

 

Essential Reading

What Are the Different Types of Sewage Treatment Systems in France?
Tricel
By Tricel

There are several different types of sewage treatment systems available in France and it can be difficult to know which is the best fit for your house. Let’s take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of each one.

Sewage Treatment Systems in France

Beyond the simple division between “traditional systems” and “approved systems” found in the applicable legal texts*, we can divide the sewage treatment systems into 4 major families.

1. Traditional Sewage Systems

The best-known sewage treatment system is the all-water tank, which succeeded the “septic tank” of previous generations, with its spreading systems (spreading trenches, sand filter, etc). These “traditional systems” use the purifying power of the soil, in which bacteria digest the matter contained in the wastewater. The main advantage of these systems is that they have supposedly “proven themselves” over time**, but they have two major disadvantages: their hold on the ground, which is generally around 100 square meters, and the need to recycle the sand filtration after 10 to 20 years – incurring an additional bill that can be as high as 10,000 euros and that we often tend to forget at the time of the implementation of the system.

2. Compact Filters

Compact filters, which replace sand with a zeolite filter bed, coconut, rock wool or another material, are based on a similar principle to traditional filters. Their hold on the ground is smaller (about 20 m2), but the cost of replacing their filter media can be prohibitive when the risks of clogging are not negligible for some of them.
• Operation of the compact filter
• Advantages of the compact filter

3. Alternative Systems

The alternative systems – reed beds and dry toilets – can be more ecologically friendly, but they require much higher maintenance.

4. Small purification plant

The microstations have an extremely small hold on the ground, which gives them a huge advantage in new constructions (as they only need small plots) as well as in rehabilitation (as they have limited impact on gardens). In addition, they discharge already purified water into the ground, instead of simply pre-treated water as is the case with traditional systems; they are therefore often described as “ecological processes”.
They are divided into 3 subfamilies:
  1. The activated sludge microstations (or free culture microstations) are the most widespread technique in collective sanitation. Unfortunately, these activated sludge microstations generate more sludge than other systems, resulting in high emptying costs. In addition, they are very sensitive to load variations, which are much more pronounced in individual homes (due to, for example, daytime absences, weekend visitors, or absences during summer vacations) than in an entire city, where load variations are balanced against the overall volume of treated effluent. This results in frequent problems of pollution release, regularly degraded bacterial flora, and therefore poor digestion of the nutrients contained in the wastewater, with the odour problems that this can cause.
  2. The so-called “SBR” (Sequencing Batch Reactor) microstations are an advanced version of activated sludge microstations. A relatively complex on-board electronic system allows the management of phases during which the wastewater is treated, then decanted, then evacuated; the user can adjust this system according to their needs (vacation periods etc.). The technological performance of SBRs is undeniable and their purification performance, in general, is unquestionable; these systems are perfectly suitable for masons/installers and users who are comfortable with electronic settings, as well as with the repair of such systems.
  3. Fixed culture microstations are usually considered as the most suitable technology for individual housing: they generate little sludge and also record the best results in terms of behaviour on load variations. Indeed, the bacterial flora, which settles on the support provided by the “bacterial bed” of the aeration compartment, develops more or less according to the incoming loads, according to a so-called “self-regulating” principle. In addition, the sludge recirculation, when it returns the residual sludge to the primary decanter (and not to the aeration compartment, as it is sometimes seen!), allows it to automatically supply the bacteria with pre-treated water – and thus with nutrients – during the prolonged absences of the occupants of the house (vacations, for example).  You will find more information on this family of microstations and on their functioning in the following pages.
Operation of the fixed culture small purification plant.

Tricel Approved Non-Collective Sanitation Systems

Rehabilitating your septic tank with an approved individual sanitation system without spreading allows you to make substantial savings in the long term.
Microstation: Tricel Microstation

Need Advice on Sewage Treatment Systems in France?

If you have further questions, don’t hesitate to get in touch with Tricel or use the contact form below.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
* See articles 6 and 7 of the Ministerial Decree on “technical requirements” of September 7, 2009 amended on March 7, 2012.
** Even though the Investig’+ study conducted by Veolia on 500 sand filters shows that these sand filters “only meet the performance requirements of approved systems in two out of three cases”, while making it clear that, among traditional systems, sand filters are 100 times better than simple spreading trenches…

Share to:  Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   Email

Previous Article The SPANC, Public Service for Non-Collective Sanitation, in France
Next Article Step By Step Guide: Your Non-Collective Sewage Treatment Project in France

Related Articles


By Tricel